Americans just can’t get enough of football on TV.
As per a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today named “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” writer Brent Schrotenboer states, “Despite the fact that ticket request is generally low for lesser dishes, a great many watchers continue to watch, regardless of whether it’s the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a game that drew only 20,256 fans last week however pulled in a normal TV crowd of 1,114,000, as indicated by ESPN.”
Schrotenboer proceeds to say, “Just one bowl game last year drew less than 1.2 million watchers by and large, as indicated by Nielsen. That is superior to the 1.1 million who watched a first day of the season ball game last year between the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Broadly broadcast ordinary season ball games in 2012 and 2013 found the middle value of around 680,000 watchers.”
Would you be able to envision then the accompanying situation for the school football bowl season:
ESPN constructs its own TV studio stringently to have school bowl games. The broadcasting company as of now claims and works 11 bowl games. In that manner, it has no agent to manage for these extra occasions, taking out haggling with a different office to have the game. No expenses for driving creation trailers or fly specialized teams most of the way the nation over.
Since this office would be worked as a TV studio and not as an open air multipurpose field, ESPN could make going to the bowl game a genuine mixed media experience for the fan, with enhancements like lasers. lights and smoke. The organization could guarantee the bowl insight for the live participant just as the watcher at home to be not normal for some other.
Be that as it may, here’s the trick: the ESPN studio would have just a set number of seats, say 5,000 or less, which would limit development costs. เกมสล็อต The studio shouldn’t be a lot bigger than the normal school football program’s training office. Sufficiently large to show to the million or more watchers that there are in reality a few fans in the stands. Subsequently, there wouldn’t be a solitary terrible seat in the house. You’d be guaranteed a very close bowl insight. What’s more, on account of the close environment, the sounds from the fans would resonate all through the office.
On account of the restricted stockpile of seats, this would compel ticket interest (and costs) up. Not any more 60,000-or 80,000-seat offices that are not exactly a quarter full. It would be a 180-degree change from the current experience, in which numerous schools need to depend on every day bargain locales to help empty a lot of allotted tickets.
In this manner, the colleges would profit since they wouldn’t be compelled to purchase the large number of tickets that they can’t sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could utilize this office on various occasions during the spread of the a multi week bowl period.
For example, this year five extra school football crews equipped for a bowl that they were not welcomed to. That is two extra games that the schools and organization are not producing a huge number of dollars from, driving audience members to rather watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be appreciating a live game. Also, promoters would prefer to delay on a TV program that most watchers will observe live and can’t quick advance through their advertisements.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, mentors and players likewise need it – going to a bowl game methods more potential gifts, more TV openness, more practice time and more reward cash.”